eMarketing & Commerce (eM+C)

You will be automatically redirected to emarketingandcommerce in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 
Vice President, Digital Messaging Solutions, Aprimo, Inc.

Engagement Matters

By Stephanie Miller

About Stephanie

Stephanie Miller is a relentless customer advocate and a champion for amazing inbox experiences. An email, deliverability and social marketing expert, she helps retail, travel, financial services, B2B, publishing and other marketers to optimize response and revenue from their online channels. She speaks and writes regularly for the industry and is very active in several direct marketing and anti-spam organizations. She is vice president, digital messaging solutions for Aprimo, Inc., a leading global integrated marketing platform provider. Feedback and column ideas most welcome, to stephanie.miller@aprimo.com.




 

Conversations

Michael Della Penna
Putting Pinterest To Work For Your Brand
Apr 20, 2012

Pinterest is the new hot property. Overnight this visual curation powerhouse has generated more traffic to websites than Twitter, Google+,...



Inside Mobile Marketing

Michael Becker
Building a Mobile Presence
Dec 15, 2011

Mobile is a revolution. The power of the personal mobile device has created the potential for businesses to build stronger...



Redefining Performance Marketing

Craig Greenfield
Facebook's Timeline for Brands: A Facebook Performance Opportunity
Mar 29, 2012

Facebook's new Timeline for Brands enables marketers to foster engagement with participants. This engagement can equal Facebook performance. Brands can...



15 Minutes Ahead

Luis Hernandez
How Evolving Mobile Behaviors are Raising the Stakes for Marketers
Jan 5, 2012

While none would argue that 2011 was the year of the mobile app, marketers have been hearing more noise about...



The View From Here

Melissa Campanelli
Everything You Want to Know About Email Marketing … and More
Nov 3, 2011

With the holidays fast approaching, it's a great time for email marketing professionals to give their programs a much needed...



Digital Marketing Takes Action

Heidi Cohen
Which is Better for Mobile Shopping, Tablets or Smartphones?
Jul 7, 2011

Are you wondering whether it’s worth providing your online retail offering on tablets, particularly the iPad? Are you also facing...



Ways of Thinking

Thorin McGee
A Facebook Fan is $136 in Lifetime Value, $3.60 in Media Impressions
Jun 29, 2010

The lifetime value of a Facebook fan is about $136 to top brands, according to this study on Facebook fan...



Stephanie Miller's Engagement Matters: The Myth (and Potential Pitfall) of Email Revenue

2
 
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 
What’s wrong with email marketing revenue? Nothing, except when it’s not optimized and could easily be 20 percent to 100 percent higher! Plus, how can a business sustain itself when it acts like “that sales guy” who sells you something but leaves you with such a bad taste in your mouth that you regret it and never engage or buy again?

This is what subscribers feel when they faithfully sign up for email marketing and instead get a lousy experience. Face it: All those people on your file who haven’t responded in a long time are likely thinking you're “that sales guy.”

Email works really well. It’s the reason everyone internally wants to send email messages to every subscriber for each announcement and promotion. Email teams set up these messages despite your nagging fears. You know that too many messages — especially when untargeted and self-promotional — turn off subscribers, churn the file and risk high complaints (i.e., clicks on the "Report Spam" button), which depress inbox placement and response. You see the proof in your data: Some portion, perhaps even a majority, of the file hasn't opened or clicked in a really long time.

Despite that empirical evidence, it sometimes seems like the magic fountain of email marketing revenue never abates. It’s difficult to make a case for doing the hard work of segmentation and creative testing if the channel still “works” without it.

Try segmentation
The truth is, most email marketing programs leave significant revenue on the table. In my experience, even simple segmentation can boost campaign results by up to 150 percent. In 2009, Marketing Sherpa found that segmentation increased overall email campaign results an average of 22 percent.

It’s a clear choice: Either have churn, subscriber fatigue, missed results, lower lifetime values, or earn more sales and revenue, higher short-term and long-term response and value, stronger subscriber satisfaction, and improved word-of-mouth. Why not segment to create better experiences for subscribers?

In defense of marketers, I suspect that part of the reason they don't segment is because they're just overwhelmed. Email marketing isn’t “broken,” so it doesn’t get the attention it deserves. Thinking this way is a strategic mistake with immense long-term impact. An email marketing file isn't an all-you-can-eat buffet; it must be nurtured.

Plus, marketers are also ever hopeful. They hope that someone on the file who's been nonresponsive will one day wake up and start clicking. Unfortunately, hope is not a strategy.

It's not just permission anymore
The anti-spam community thinks marketers are lazy. Mailbox providers like Yahoo and Gmail — and blacklist owners like those at Spamhaus — blame marketers for sending too frequently to subscribers who aren't engaging. The penalty is that senders will be blocked from reaching any subscribers on their networks. Marketers must maintain active files to prove their efforts are actually providing value to subscribers.

The problem may be more widespread than you think. Return Path’s Global Email Deliverability Benchmark Report, for example, found that 20 percent of legitimate commercial email never reaches the inbox in North America. Permission isn't enough. Senders must track and improve key metrics that affect email deliverability, including complaints, unknown users and file responsiveness.

Subscribers aren't afraid to call you on irrelevancy by using the delete, unsubscribe or "Report Spam" buttons. It only takes a small number of complaints to get a marketer or publisher blocked. Plus, subscribers who feel marketers abuse the permission they gave them will not only be disgusted with them, but they'll tell their friends and followers. Social networks make it easy for one person to tell dozens or even hundreds of others that he or she got a stupid email message — even from a brand he or she knows, loves and buys from.

The penalties and blocking filters are getting harsher, but the opportunities are also brighter. Every email marketer can be earning higher response by sending fewer, more targeted messages.

In my April blog post, I’ll discuss ways segmentation can be used to lift response and revenue. Meanwhile, let me know what you think. Please share any ideas or comments below.

Companies Mentioned:

Sections:

2

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Stehanie Miller - Posted on April 07, 2010
Great point, Darrell, thank you. I agree - relevancy improves as the segment becomes more targeted and behavior-based. Even persona data can get stale quickly in our fast-paced, online research driven society!

Permission has to be earned with every message.

Thanks for sharing!
Best,
Stephanie (author)
Darrell Rosebush - Posted on April 07, 2010
Many great points Stephanie - the concepts of user engagement and message relevance are just as important as permission in my books. As a segment increases in volume (number of verified email addys) the potential that the message is not relevant to a portion of that segment also increases. Utilizing dynamic content or even deployment based on the individual recipient's actions, general responsiveness, etc is a nice, flexible alternative. It's all about adapting to changing and evolving user expectations and as you stated above, keeping the frequency at an optimal level. I'd suggest senders try testing specific groups at preset sending frequencies, keeping an eye on unsubscribes and any feedback they hopefully get access to.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Stehanie Miller - Posted on April 07, 2010
Great point, Darrell, thank you. I agree - relevancy improves as the segment becomes more targeted and behavior-based. Even persona data can get stale quickly in our fast-paced, online research driven society!

Permission has to be earned with every message.

Thanks for sharing!
Best,
Stephanie (author)
Darrell Rosebush - Posted on April 07, 2010
Many great points Stephanie - the concepts of user engagement and message relevance are just as important as permission in my books. As a segment increases in volume (number of verified email addys) the potential that the message is not relevant to a portion of that segment also increases. Utilizing dynamic content or even deployment based on the individual recipient's actions, general responsiveness, etc is a nice, flexible alternative. It's all about adapting to changing and evolving user expectations and as you stated above, keeping the frequency at an optimal level. I'd suggest senders try testing specific groups at preset sending frequencies, keeping an eye on unsubscribes and any feedback they hopefully get access to.